The Pros & Cons of Different Aircraft Types

Air New Zealand Airbus A320neo at Auckland with a Qantas 737, Fiji Airways 330 and Emirates A380 in background
An Air New Zealand A320, Qantas 737, Fiji Airways A330 and Emirates A380 at Auckland Airport. Photo: Matt Graham.

When booking a flight, you might have a choice of flights on different aircraft types.

Knowledgeable frequent flyers often go out of their way to book one specific plane type over another, because they know they’ll get a more comfortable ride. But how do you tell the difference between different plane types, and which planes are better?

Narrow-body vs wide-body planes

One of the biggest differences in plane types, from a passenger perspective, is between narrow-body and wide-body planes.

Narrow-body planes like the Boeing 737 or Airbus A320 are smaller and have only one aisle in the cabin. Airlines typically use narrow-bodies for shorter flights.

Economy Class on the Thai AirAsia Airbus A320
The Economy Class cabin on an Airbus A320 belonging to AirAsia. Photo: Matt Graham.

Many frequent flyers prefer wide-body planes like the Airbus A330 or Boeing 777, as these have two aisles. They are larger, and airlines often configure them with longer flights in mind. There’s usually more space on board, including areas where you can stretch your legs without being in the way of other people.

Qantas A330-300 Economy Class
Economy Class on a Qantas Airbus A330-300, a wide-body aircraft. Photo: Matt Graham.

On a wide-body aircraft, the seats are more likely to have seat-back entertainment screens. Business Class typically has comfortable lie-flat beds – rather than seats that just recline a bit. Since there are twin aisles, it’s also easier to access the toilets.

For these reasons, many people prefer flying on wide-body planes. Some people will even go well out of the way to do so!

Boeing vs Airbus

America’s Boeing and Europe’s Airbus are the world’s two main manufacturers of large, commercial passenger jets. (Embraer and various other companies also make regional jets.)

Many pilots have a preference for either Boeing or Airbus because the two plane makers have fundamentally different approaches to designing aircraft. Boeing gives more control directly to the pilots, while Airbus planes use “fly by wire” technology that takes pilots’ inputs and runs them through a computer. In some cases, the Airbus computer might even override the pilot’s yoke inputs – for better, or worse.

From a passenger perspective, the differences between Boeing and Airbus planes are more subtle. But as a general rule, for whatever reason, Airbus planes tend to have slightly wider Economy Class seats than Boeing planes.

Turboprops vs jets

Another key difference between plane types is between turboprop and jet aircraft.

You can easily tell the difference because turboprop planes have propellers, rather than jet engines. They are usually used on shorter regional flights.

Planes classified as turboprops include the Saab 340, ATR72 and Dash 8.

SAS ATR-72 (operated by Xfly) at Copenhagen Airport
An SAS ATR-72, a turboprop plane, at Copenhagen Airport. Photo: Matt Graham.

Some flyers consider turboprop planes to be less comfortable because they are smaller, noisier and any turbulence is often more noticeable when flying in them. They don’t usually have a Business Class cabin and you can feel the vibration of the engines a bit more.

That’s not to say that turboprop planes aren’t safe. In fact, planes like the Dash 8 are highly capable, reliable and efficient aircraft that serve a specific purpose. And some frequent flyers actually prefer these planes on shorter flights because there are fewer passengers – which could mean better service – and it feels more like “real” flying.

QantasLink Dash 8 Q300 Economy cabin
The cabin of a QantasLink Dash 8, a turboprop plane. Photo: Matt Graham.

Airlines typically use turboprop planes on routes that either have too few passengers to justify jet service, or to fly to smaller airports with short runways. That’s because these planes are capable of taking off and landing on much shorter runways than jet aircraft. Their cruise speeds are a bit slower than jet aircraft, but the difference is usually marginal on the short routes that turboprop planes fly.

Characteristics, pros & cons of specific plane types

So, with all of this in mind, how can you tell specific plane types from others? What are the main pros & cons of different aircraft types?

Let’s take a closer look at the main jet aircraft types, in order from smallest to biggest…

Embraer E-Jet (E170 and E190)

Finnair E190 and a Lufthansa tail at Berlin Brandenburg Airport
A Finnair Embraer E190 at Berlin Airport. Photo: Matt Graham.

The Embraer E-Jet family includes the following aircraft types:

  • Embraer E170/E175 – a smaller variant commonly used by regional airlines in the USA
  • Embraer E190/E195 – a larger version used around the world, including in Australia by Alliance Airlines/QantasLink

The E-Jets are a really comfortable aircraft from a passenger perspective. They have a 2-2 seating layout in Economy Class, meaning there are no middle seats anywhere on the plane!

Airbus A220

The Airbus A220, originally known as the Bombardier CSeries, is an efficient, modern and very comfortable aircraft. Economy Class typically has a 2-3 seating layout, with wide seats and pleasant mood lighting.

You can find the Airbus A220 in service with airlines including QantasLink, Air Baltic, Air Canada, Delta and SWISS.

Boeing 737

Virgin Australia and Qantas Boeing 737s
Both Virgin Australia and Qantas fly Boeing 737s, which are narrow-body aircraft. Photo: Jonathan Wong.

The Boeing 737 is the best selling Boeing aircraft of all time, and a common sight in Australian skies as it’s the backbone of Qantas and Virgin Australia’s short-haul fleets.

Different versions of the Boeing 737 have been around for well over 50 years. The main types you’ll see flying today in Australia are:

  • The Boeing 737-700 and 737-800, which are “next-generation” Boeing 737s
  • The Boeing 737-8 MAX, a newer version of the 737 with larger engines that Virgin Australia flies.

While these are very common short-haul aircraft, they often feel a bit cramped. Economy Class typically has a 3-3 layout, while Business Class usually features recliner seats in a 2-2 configuration.

Airbus A320

An ITA Airways Airbus A320 at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport
An ITA Airways Airbus A320. Photo: Matt Graham.

The Airbus A320 is another extremely popular short-haul jet used by airlines all around the world. Like the Boeing 737, it typically has a 3-3 seating configuration in Economy Class. However, the A320 actually has a wider fuselage – meaning the seats are each about an inch wider.

The Airbus A320 family includes the shorter A319 and longer A321. Airbus has also developed newer, more fuel-efficient versions of the A320 family including the A320neo, A321neo LR (currently in service with Jetstar) and the A321XLR (which will soon enter service with Qantas).

Boeing 767

United Airlines Boeing 767-300
A United Airlines Boeing 767. Photo: United.

While the Boeing 767 is an older wide-body jet, it’s an extremely comfortable aircraft. In Economy Class, most airlines use a 2-3-2 seating configuration which means there’s only one middle seat per row.

Airbus A330

Qantas A330-300 taxies at Sydney Airport
A Qantas A330-300 at Sydney Airport. Photo: Qantas.

The Airbus A330, a wide-body jet typically used for medium and long-haul flights, is another passenger favourite. It has a comfortable 2-4-2 Economy Class seating layout, with fairly wide seats. Up the front, most airlines have installed lie-flat beds in Business Class.

However, there are some exceptions. Low-cost carriers including AirAsia X, Vietjet Air and Cebu Pacific have opted for a much tighter 3-3-3 Economy configuration which is honestly miserable.

The Airbus A330-200 and slightly longer A330-300 are the most common A330 variants you’ll find flying in Australian skies. Some overseas airlines, including Air Mauritius and TAP Air Portugal, fly the more modern A330neo.

Airbus also has a similar plane called the A340. This has a similar cabin layout to the A330, but it has four engines instead of two.

Boeing 787

LATAM Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner photographed on May 13, 2016 from Wolfe Air Aviation Learjet 25B.
A LATAM Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner. Photo: LATAM.

Also known as the “Dreamliner”, the 787 is Boeing’s newest wide-body jet. This plane type comes in three variants:

  • The shorter 787-8, used by airlines including Jetstar
  • The 787-9, used by airlines including Qantas
  • The longer 787-10, used by some overseas airlines including Etihad

The Boeing 787 is designed for long-haul flights, and can even fly from Perth to London without stopping. It has some innovative cabin features including dimmable windows and better air quality, as the cabin altitude is kept lower than on other aircraft types. This means the cabin is more humid, so you’re less likely to get off a long-haul flight with dry skin and a sore throat.

Boeing originally intended for the Boeing 787 to have a spacious 2-4-2 configuration in Economy Class. Unfortunately, only one airline – Japan Airlines – has opted for that. Every other 787 operator uses a narrower 3-3-3 Economy layout, which can feel tight on an ultra long-haul flight.

Airbus A350

Singapore Airlines A350-900 at Brisbane Airport
Singapore Airlines A350-900 at Brisbane Airport. Photo: Matt Graham.

The Airbus A350 is a modern, comfortable wide-body plane type that’s a delight to fly in. It has a long range and even has a cool cockpit window that looks like sunglasses.

Most airlines use a 3-3-3 seating layout in Economy Class. While this is the same as the Boeing 787, the cabin is wider so the A350 seats are also wider than on the 787.

Boeing 777

The Boeing 777-300ER is a popular plane type
A Qatar Airways Boeing 777-300ER. Photo: Qatar Airways.

The Boeing 777 is another highly capable wide-body jet, used mainly for long-range flights. But this twin-engine aircraft is not quite as modern as the Boeing 787 or Airbus A350, and it’s a bit noisier.

In the past, most airlines configured Economy Class on their Boeing 777s in a spacious 3-3-3 layout. Unfortunately, 3-4-3 is now the norm on airlines including Emirates, Qatar Airways, American Airlines, KLM, Air Canada, Air New Zealand and British Airways. But carriers including Saudia and Singapore Airlines still retain a 3-3-3 Economy Class layout on its 777s.

Boeing 747

Lufthansa Boeing 747 at Frankfurt Airport
A Lufthansa Boeing 747 at Frankfurt Airport. Photo: Matt Graham.

The iconic Boeing 747 is known as the “queen of the skies” for a reason. Easily recognisable for its upper deck “bubble” and four engines, it’s a great long-haul aircraft. This is especially the case if you’re in Business or First Class, as you might have the opportunity to sit in the “nose” or the semi-private upper deck. But even in Economy, it offers a spacious cabin in a 3-4-3 layout.

Nowadays, there are only a handful of airlines flying Boeing 747s in regular passenger service. Your best bet is to look for a flight on a Boeing 747-8 with Lufthansa, Korean Air or Air China.

Airbus A380

Emirates Airbus A380
An Emirates Airbus A380. Image: Emirates.

The Airbus A380 is the other four-engined wide-body jet in regular use around the world. The “superjumbo” is iconic for its full-length upper deck… and because, well, it looks a bit like a whale!

This modern, spacious and very comfortable jetliner is a hit with passengers. It offers fairly wide Economy Class seats, and there are handy side storage lockers beside the window seats on the upper deck.

This is the flagship aircraft of most of the airlines that still operate the Airbus A380. In fact, many airlines save their best products for their A380s. Emirates, Etihad, Qatar Airways and Korean Air even have bars on their A380s for Business and First Class passengers, while Qantas offers a small lounge area on its A380.

________________________

Related Articles

Community Comments

Loading new replies...

I would say that beyond these 4 categories: small regional jet, standard single aisle (737/a320), standard wide body and the 2 floor planes (a380, 747) most passengers wouldn't be able to tell the subtle differences and only care about how the interior is laid out.

ANA 787 configured with 34" of leg room vs most other 787s? I doubt the average passenger would even realise that its the same air frame.

As for going out of the way to fly better aircraft, I suspect there would be a preference for widebody over narrow, but at the same time context is very important for people to understand. There are times when going for the widebody and the slight comforts are potentially worse off.

Reply Like

click to expand...

I guess this will be across all modern Airbuses: in a complete accessibility fail, the signs for whether toilets are free or occupied break the rule of informational redundancy (only a colour change, no cross-through or text) AND the warm green and red difference is a total cough for red-green colourblind users. I breathe a sigh of relief when I board a Boeing cos then I'm not squinting desperately to see if I can work out the colour, or queuing needlessly for ages. (There's a chance my sample size is not large enough, but I believe this is a clear Airbus/Boeing difference.)

Reply Like

It's really the combination of airline and aircraft type that matters (and even then numerous airlines have multiple subfleets and can be known for last minute substitutions.

While Y on most 332/333/338/339s is good, like say the 2x4x2 on QF, that's until you hit the LCCs that pack 3x3x3 into the frame (AirAsiaXs and Cebu Pacific)

Whereas (almost) everyone is 3x3x3 in a 787.

Reply Like

For most absolute beginners, it’s actually most important to explain to them that aircraft type is completely independent from seat type. It always strikes me how many of the “public” do not understand this. And an old 777 on Emirates with their 2-3-2 config can indeed become rather uncomfortable.

Just experienced the A220 for the first time the other day on a short Air France hop from Paris to Berlin. Clearly not a “real” Airbus in the classic sense but a super nice little plane nevertheless. Glad that Qantas decided to purchase them.

One more point I’d make on the A330- the new A330 NEOs have a MUCH more modern interior than the old A330s Qantas still flies. From a passenger perspective, it feels like an all new aircraft and is becoming more and more popular with airlines for routes that don’t quite require an A350.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

Inspired by AFF forum posts from @FlyingFiona and @aikman and in this thread...

I've written an article summarising the differences between different plane types, and the pros & cons of each one:

For those of you who aren't familiar with the subtle differences between different aircraft types, I hope this helps you to make a more informed decision next time you book a flight!

And for the frequent flyers on the forum who know all the ins & outs of different plane types: Do you agree with my comments? You can share your thoughts here!

A350 new Business Class unbeatable
787 ageing like milk..

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

As a poor (read: economy) passenger I really love the A380 - it has more space for tall people like me, and I even discovered that on the upper deck there are a few seats where the seat in front is absent because there seems to be some kind of trap door there. Sorry, I know it is a bit vague but I still remember how wonderful it was to stretch out on along haul from Europe; and even the normal seats have more space.

Reply 2 Likes

Not enough emphasis is given to the benefits of the lower Cabin Altitude of more recent designs from the A380 onward, including the A350 and 787. These aircraft run a cabin altitude of 6000ft equivalent, as opposed to 8000ft of older designs like the 777 and A330.

The better air pressure and higher air quality is a game changer for long haul.

Reply 1 Like

I like the E190 in business with its 1-2 layout. But the overhead bins on the left hand side in the business cabin are very small.

Reply Like

This is a really great comparative article, @Matt Graham, thank you so much for taking the time to do this. I will be paying much more attention to the aircraft types when weighing up my travel options from now. It's also very helpful to know which craft are nosier than others.

Reply Like

Not enough emphasis is given to the benefits of the lower Cabin Altitude of more recent designs from the A380 onward, including the A350 and 787. These aircraft run a cabin altitude of 6000ft equivalent, as opposed to 8000ft of older designs like the 777 and A330.

The better air pressure and higher air quality is a game changer for long haul.

I think that can be overrated compared to other variables. Worse jetlag I've had in recent times was after 12 hours on a 787 (in J), but with an uncomfortable seat equating to minimal comfort and shuteye.

Reply Like