Sneaky Change to Qantas Flight Credits

Qantas Flexible Flying website
Qantas has the flexibility to change and cancel flights as needed, but the same flexibility isn’t fully extended to customers…

Qantas has come under fire after customers discovered they were being charged significantly more when booking with a flight credit.

Over recent weeks, both A Current Affair and ABC News have accused Qantas of price gouging, with some customers claiming they had to pay triple the regular price to redeem their flight credit for a new booking.

In one example highlighted by the ABC, Qantas required a customer to pay more than $1,400 for a return flight from Adelaide to Brisbane when redeeming a flight credit from a trip they previously had to cancel due to COVID-19 border closures. But seats on the same flights were publicly available for just $437 return.

So, what’s going on?

Qantas gave customers additional flexibility during the pandemic

Since the start of the pandemic, Qantas has encouraged customers with cancelled flights to accept a flight credit instead of a refund.

Qantas is pushing customers to request a flight credit by 30 April
As far back as April 2020, Qantas was doing everything it could to encourage customers to accept a credit voucher if they could no longer travel due to coronavirus.

To give people the confidence to book new flights, Qantas also introduced a Fly Flexible policy in 2020. This policy has been continuously extended and is still in place now.

Under Fly Flexible, Qantas is waiving change fees an unlimited number of times for customers who need to change their flights (any fare difference still applies). Alternatively, customers can opt for a flight credit if they are no longer able to travel.

Throughout most of 2020 and 2021, Qantas also made flight credits more flexible to allow customers to redeem their vouchers for multiple bookings. This meant customers who had to cancel expensive long-haul Business Class bookings still had reasonable options to use this value towards domestic flight bookings while the international border was closed, without forfeiting thousands of dollars. Qantas also extended the validity of flight credits beyond their usual 12-month expiry, giving people more time to use them.

If you received a Qantas flight credit for a booking originally made on or before 30 September 2021, these more flexible rules still apply. But the rules changed on 1 October 2021.

Qantas changes to flight credits from October 2021

If your Qantas flight credit was for a cancelled flight booked on or after 1 October 2021, the old pre-COVID rules now apply.

This is what the Qantas Flight Credits webpage says:

Qantas flight credit rules
Information about redeeming flight credits from the Qantas website.

In other words, you can now only redeem a flight credit for another booking of the same or higher value. You can also only use your flight credit towards one new booking.

In the case of the customer who wanted to use their flight credit for flights from Adelaide to Brisbane, the booking they had originally cancelled was worth $1,400. Therefore, Qantas would only let them book a new ticket worth at least that amount using their credit voucher.

The following additional conditions also now apply to Qantas flight credits, which now expire after 12 months:

Additional conditions for using Qantas flight credits
Additional conditions for using Qantas flight credits.

The ABC reports that when asked about this at a press conference, Qantas CEO Alan Joyce said the accusations of price gouging were “absolute nonsense”.

“The flight credit scheme, the way it actually works, if you decide you’re not travelling, it goes into a credit, and this is giving people more flexibility than they’ve ever had because of COVID. But, you get the exact same as what you paid for,” Joyce said.

On this issue, a Qantas spokesperson said earlier this month that the airline is “completely transparent” about its rules surrounding credits, and that “other major airlines have a similar approach.”

The spokesperson also said that “if there are extenuating circumstances, we encourage people to talk to us”.

It’s not exactly clear how people are supposed to do this when the Qantas call centre doesn’t answer the phone. Even so, if you are lucky enough to get through to somebody, the staff are not actually empowered to help and just recite the booking conditions.

Are these rules reasonable?

On one hand, all Qantas has done here is revert to the old rules that applied to flight credits before the pandemic. In fact, the new rules under Fly Flexible are slightly better for customers because they don’t have to pay an additional fee to cancel non-flexible bookings.

It’s also true that Qantas states on its website that the new fare amount must be of equal or higher value when redeeming a flight credit.

On the other hand, the travel landscape is now completely different to how it was just a few years ago. Just because a policy was in place prior to COVID-19, doesn’t mean it was fair then and doesn’t mean it still makes sense in 2022.

Why shouldn’t Qantas customers be able to use their flight credits to book new flights worth the same amount as the value of their credit – even if it’s across multiple bookings?

There is an argument that this would allow customers to cancel their flights and rebook at a lower price if a flight went on sale after they booked. But surely there is a way to get around this which doesn’t involve making customers pay 300% more to redeem their flight credit than they would otherwise pay to make a new booking.

As one AFF member posted on our forum:

Nothing wrong legally… but ethically?
QF demands 100% flexibility from its passengers to cancel flights, cancel routes, determine how much and when they will refund you, the ability to substitute planes, cabins and services… yet if the passenger needs flexibility through no fault of their own they stand to lose significantly.

The contractual protections and special rights which the airlines have claimed – and Aussie law supports – date back to the days of DC3s and the difficulty of airline operations 50 years ago.
MEL_Traveller, 2 February 2022

Another person wrote:

I know it is in the conditions that you can only use the credit for a higher priced fare, but that is really a pretty savage condition that takes advantage of Qantas’s market power relative to the low power of the consumer. Also, I think most people are not aware of what this really means until it is time for them to try to use the credit.
Seat0B, 14 February 2022

Don’t opt for a flight credit

Because of these changes to Qantas flight credits, we’d suggest avoiding them where possible. If you need to change your booking, try to change the date rather than requesting a flight credit with these conditions.

If your flight has been cancelled by Qantas, also remember that you have a right to a full refund. Qantas may try to offer you a flight credit, but if the airline has cancelled your flight, you should push for a refund instead.

So, what are other Australian airlines doing?

Despite Qantas’ claims that it is following standard industry practice, other Australian airlines do not have this policy.

Virgin Australia also gives its customers the option to change their flight for free or cancel for a flight credit if they can longer travel due to COVID-19. Virgin travel bank credits are valid for 12 months too, but can be treated like cash towards an unlimited number of new bookings. Virgin also allows travel banks to be used to book flights for other people, which Qantas does not allow.

Rex still offers a COVID Refund Guarantee which allows customers to request a refund (minus Rex’s booking fees) if you can no longer travel for any COVID-related reason, even if the Rex flight operates as scheduled.

Air New Zealand, which does not give refunds for flights cancelled by the airline, also lets customers redeem their flight credits towards multiple new bookings.

 

Join the discussion on the Australian Frequent Flyer forum: Qantas Accused of Price Gouging

________________________

Related Articles

Community Comments

Loading new replies...

Surprised they didn't claim this was IT error and quietly change it, instead their statement doubles down that they're intentionally inflating the price for people who are rebooking from credit vouchers?

Edit: Are other airlines doing this as well? A quick check of BA's policy suggests not - you can cancel for any reason, get the full amount back, and use it to pay any other fare.

Reply 1 Like

If NP comes up with a recipe for raw prawn we’ll no doubt be getting them inflight as well 🙁

Reply 4 Likes

I suspect the issue here is the 'base fare must be equal or higher value than the original base fare' rule is in play. QF reinstated this rule last year I believe for tickets issued on/after 1st Oct.

If they originally paid for a higher fare and want to use the credit for a cheaper date later, then they get stuck with paying the higher fare.

Assuming that this is the scenario, then QF hasn't done anything wrong.

It's listed here: https://www.qantas.com/au/en/manage-booking/credit-vouchers.html

Edit: Are other airlines doing this as well? A quick check of BA's policy suggests not - you can cancel for any reason, get the full amount back, and use it to pay any other fare.

VA has never cared about the new flight being equal or higher value, both now and pre-covid. Their travel bank system, a feature of Sabre, is very good.

SQ you can use the credit across two bookings.

BA and AA you can use the credit across multiple bookings.

QR, JL and NH will refund all tickets, regardless of reason, in full.

LH/LX/OS/SN require equal or higher value unless it's a flex fare then you're allowed to go down in value.

Reply 9 Likes

click to expand...

VA has never cared about the new flight being equal or higher value, both now and pre-covid. Their travel bank system, a feature of Sabre, is very good.

SQ you can use the credit across two bookings.

BA and AA you can use the credit across multiple bookings.

QR, JL and NH will refund all tickets, regardless of reason, in full.

LH/LX/OS/SN require equal or higher value unless it's a flex fare then you're allowed to go down in value.

But what about NZ? 😂

-RooFlyer88

Reply Like

But what about NZ? 😂

NZ is by far the worst - LCC standard. No refunds even if the flight was cancelled by them (except if it involves USA). Their credits work much like VA though.

Reply Like

I will point out an old adage I have, never cancel your flights until the very last moment. Don't give the airline any courtesy by cancelling in advance even if you know you won't go. Let the airline make an unforced error be it them cancelling them flight or making a significant enough change where the ticket becomes fully flexible. Aside from free cancellations 24 hours after booking on some airlines, I have yet to see a single airline that provides any benefit to cancelling right away over cancelling an hour or two before the flight takes off. Even if nothing happens and you have to cancel outright at the last minute, you get the pleasure of knowing you held one of their seats until the very last minute.

-RooFlyer88

Reply 6 Likes

click to expand...

I suspect the issue here is the 'base fare must be equal or higher value than the original base fare' rule is in play. QF reinstated this rule last year I believe for tickets issued on/after 1st Oct.

If they originally paid for a higher fare and want to use the credit for a cheaper date later, then they get stuck with paying the higher fare.

Assuming that this is the scenario, then QF hasn't done anything wrong.

It's listed here: https://www.qantas.com/au/en/manage-booking/credit-vouchers.html

Nothing wrong legally... but ethically?

QF demands 100% flexibility from its passengers to cancel flights, cancel routes, determine how much and when they will refund you, the ability to substitute planes, cabins and services... yet if the passenger needs flexibility through no fault of their own they stand to lose significantly.

The contractual protections and special rights which the airlines have claimed - and Aussie law supports - date back to the days of DC3s and the difficulty of airline operations 50 years ago.

Reply 9 Likes

click to expand...

Not sure if everyone watched the Current Affairs video linked in the article nor the official video response from a QF representative, both of which were equally amusing. In particular, I call your attention to one customer who had the joy of spending 12 hours on hold to rebook his overpriced fare over the phone with QF since it couldn't be booked online. Now that's what I call customer attention!

I will say that QF is not the only Australian airline with similarly restrictive policies. In particular, I had a return segment on UA from March 2020 that had to be cancelled due to COVID. Agent on the phone told me I could rebook anytime I wanted back to LHR so long as travel commenced before March 2022. Fast forward to October and I'm now told they had to reprice and surprise surprise the return segment was $5,000 fare more than the $1100 I paid for LHR > SYD return on UA.

-RooFlyer88

Reply Like

click to expand...

Meh. This won't put a dent on QF's reputation. Most flight credit holders will quietly use up their credits on the higher priced fares. Nothing will change.

As the man in the video who spent 12 hours on hold said, "We support them. We always fly Qantas."

Qantas seems like it has the most deeply loyal customers in the world.

Reply Like

I have yet to see a single airline that provides any benefit to cancelling right away over cancelling an hour or two before the flight takes off.

This is incredibly poor advice.

Depending on the fare and/or carrier, no show fees may apply, including losing the entire ticket value when cancelled less than X hours before departure. It's designed to stop exactly what you describe.

Until Aus opened up in Nov last year, QR considered a cancellation within 72 hours of departure to be a no show where a no show fee would apply.

Some carriers don't let you leave a ticket in credit either so you are forced to move it to a new date at the time that you cancel or you lose the ticket value.

Nothing wrong legally... but ethically?

That is exactly why I specifically wrote legally. Morally, ethically, etc ... I don't agree with the rule being reinstated especially when VA will allow you to go to equal, higher or lower fare. VA even lets you use a credit for someone else to travel. Most other carriers don't allow a name change.

Reply 2 Likes

click to expand...