As 2 planes have been out of service most of the time, once QF finishes this process, will they have some spare A330 capacity which can be deployed?
After the 333s are done (mid-May) am expecting the 332s to be done 2/time which would take us through to end-Aug and you also have three 333s that need a repaint so you are probably at mid-Oct at earliest before all is complete.
I suspect this then creates some additional capacity, but for what routes is unknown.
Left field alternative is that they use the capacity to retire the two unrefurbes 747s, but I don't think any of the 330s have the legs for the correct routes, so think this will wait for the first 789s
Dare I hope PER<->SIN?
Didn't seem to work in the middle of the mining boom, can't seem to see it working now
Left field alternative is that they use the capacity to retire the two unrefurbes 747s, but I don't think any of the 330s have the legs for the correct routes, so think this will wait for the first 789s
Given the current fuel price, they might as well.Indeed confirmed at the results that the two unrefurbed 747s will receive a very minor refresh and toil on into 2017
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
So the question now becomes - what will Qantas do with the additional A330 capacity come late 2016??
They could use the additional capacity to increase Asia services. A good example is SYD-HKG (currently 11x per week) which can be increased to 2x daily and also MEL-SIN (10x per week from May).
Another possibility is to open up new routes such as MEL-NRT/HND, MEL-HNL.
Today's press releases around the release of results did mention increasing PER-SIN capacity.
Isn't that what most likely killed off the yields ex-PER in the first place? That and the ridiculously uncompetitive fares...Going to 10x weekly using the old QF77/78 timings. Whilst I am not an expert in fleet utilization, the 04:15 arrival isn't that appealing IMO.
Isn't that what most likely killed off the yields ex-PER in the first place? That and the ridiculously uncompetitive fares...
Cutting Singapore out of the run to London out of Perth was a big mistake. I think the only way to recover would be a 787 in a couple of years time that can fly direct.
Via Singapore would be my pick. Flying over Dubai would be just great. Going back to PER-SIN-LHR would be brilliant.
Think you will find the re-routing of Qantas Europe flights via DXB killed PER-SIN. Said it before, that the number of passengers using Singapore as a one and only destination is small. Don't have the figures but it was under 25%. The rest are in direct transit or using Singapore as a stopover to somewhere else. This in turn means Qantas is left flighting for the point to point traffic, with a small amount of transit owing to their limited onwards connections, especially compared to SQ.
Via Singapore would be my pick. Flying over Dubai would be just great. Going back to PER-SIN-LHR would be brilliant.
When they last increased HKG services AJ stated that QF could not get additional slots at HKG with good timings. A advantage that CX has with so many slots in HKG is that they could rearrange flights to add more services into Australia, except they have used up all their bilateral allocation into the major cities.They could use the additional capacity to increase Asia services. A good example is SYD-HKG (currently 11x per week) which can be increased to 2x daily and also MEL-SIN (10x per week from May).
Another possibility is to open up new routes such as MEL-NRT/HND, MEL-HNL.
